News Article
EAT success for 12 KBW 3rd six pupil
The employer argued that the ET’s decision not to review its judgment in favour of the Claimant was perverse. The employer had applied for a review on the basis that he had not received the notice of appearance and that he had not attended at the hearing. The applications for review were dismissed (again by Chairman sitting alone). In their decision the EAT found that a long-standing decision (Hancock v Middleton (1982)) was to be distinguished.Phillip Cattlin t/a Success First v Jodie Croxford Employment Appeal Tribunal, UKEAT/0231/06
To read the full case summary please go to our case commentaries section in updates and resources.